Skip to content

Manufacturing Newspapers for Sleeping Purposes

The shift in how Americans consume news is notable. A study conducted in 2012 revealed that only 23% of U.S. residents admitted to reading a print newspaper, a significant drop from 2000 when about 50% claimed to be reading a print newspaper daily.

Manufacturing Newsprint for Sleeping Materials
Manufacturing Newsprint for Sleeping Materials

Manufacturing Newspapers for Sleeping Purposes

In the realm of sustainable farming practices, the use of newsprint as animal bedding has gained attention due to its fibrous nature and high absorbency. However, when it comes to shredded versus chopped newsprint, there is a lack of direct comparative studies.

Newsprint, derived from wood pulp, is fibrous in nature, making it an attractive choice for bedding material. It has the property of absorbency, effectively managing moisture in stalls. Pieces between 1.5 and 3 inches have good absorbency but are difficult to retain in a bale, while pieces under 1.5 inches have a high absorbency rate but pose a risk of cellulose dust due to their fine nature. On the other hand, pieces between 3 and 5 inches are slightly easier to handle with hand implements but require on-site preparation, while pieces over 5 inches are balable and easier to transport, but are less absorbent than smaller sizes.

Shredded newsprint, with its larger surface area, often improves absorbency by allowing more rapid wicking of moisture. However, it can become dusty or compacted over time, potentially requiring frequent changing and stirring. In contrast, chopped pieces may be less dusty but could retain moisture unevenly.

Bedding comfort impacts animal behavior. Softer, fluffier bedding, like shredded newsprint, is usually preferred by animals for nesting and resting. It can reduce stress and promote natural behaviors. In contrast, chopped, larger pieces may not offer the same cushioning or moldable environment, possibly affecting comfort and activity levels.

Despite the lack of specific studies comparing shredded and chopped newsprint as animal bedding, common principles about bedding materials can be inferred. For precise evaluation, controlled studies measuring moisture absorbency rates, ammonia control, dust levels, and animal preference or health markers would be necessary.

The steady decline of newsprint read by Americans continues to contribute to landfill waste. However, there are multiple ways to reduce, reuse, and recycle newsprint while growing a recycling infrastructure.

A 2012 study, funded by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, examined newsprint as an alternative bedding material for farm animals. The study addressed newsprint with black ink, the supply of newsprint in Ohio, effects as a bedding, absorption, and decomposition. However, it did not consider colored inks and non-newspaper papers suitable for bedding material at the time.

In conclusion, while shredded newsprint is generally more absorbent and preferred by animals for comfort, it may require more frequent management. Chopped newsprint, on the other hand, will be less absorbent, potentially less dusty but less comfortable. Further empirical testing would clarify the difference definitively. For recommendations, pine shavings and other materials are popular for many animals due to high absorbency and comfort, while shredded paper-type bedding is often used as a cost-effective alternative but varies according to preparation and animal species.

Read also:

Latest