"What's your assessment of our services?" or "How would you score our performance?"

"What's your assessment of our services?" or "How would you score our performance?"

In the digital age, booking a car rental through travel platforms seems like a convenient solution. However, as one customer recently discovered, the process can be fraught with challenges.

The journey began when the customer's flight was cancelled, leading to the cancellation of their car rental booking. To their surprise, the platform required them to contact a US company with a British phone number, which proved to be unreachable via the provided numbers.

The customer's booking was made through a German intermediary with an American company based in the UK. When they reached out to the Spanish car rental company, they found that the reservation was nowhere to be found, due to the booking being made through an intermediary.

The car rental company refused to refund the money, citing the customer's 'no show'. This left the customer in a difficult position, as they had not cancelled the booking themselves but were instead affected by the flight cancellation.

The platform itself does not provide direct customer service for car rental issues. Instead, they rely on contracted call centers, often based in India, to handle customer service queries.

Platform companies, including those in the travel industry, make their money through monopolies. They offer car rentals with separate contracts for the vehicle and insurance policy, both of which may be debited from the account months before the trip.

In an attempt to streamline the complaint-handling process, these platforms implement structured, customer-centric complaint resolution systems. This involves clear communication, timely responses, and escalation procedures.

They offer multiple communication channels, including contact forms, email, chat, phone, and social media support. Fast responses, ideally under 4 hours, help build trust and reduce repeat contacts. AI-powered chatbots provide 24/7 instant support for common issues, while human agents handle more complex queries.

However, in the case of cancellations or unavailable services, the platform's role is somewhat limited. They notify customers proactively if changes occur, provide options such as rebooking, refunds, or credits, and facilitate direct communication with the underlying service provider when necessary.

Despite these efforts, the customer expressed frustration with the free market and plans to use state railway in the future. The issue of housing shortages in European cities, exacerbated by companies like Airbnb, also played a role in their decision.

In conclusion, while travel platforms strive to provide a seamless experience, challenges can still arise. It's essential for customers to be aware of these potential issues and to be prepared to navigate them effectively.

1. The customer's inconvenience could have potentially been avoided if the travel platform had a direct contact number for the US company, ensuring easier communication and faster resolution.
2. In light of the customer's difficult experience, it would be beneficial for travel platforms to disclose more transparently the involvement of intermediaries in their booking processes, to prevent confusion and potential miscommunications.
3. As the customer turns to using state railway instead, there is a growing sentiment among some consumers to move away from digital platforms that rely on opaque financial arrangements and intermediaries in the travel industry, particularly when it comes to car rentals.

Read also: